Perhaps you are a graduate student at master or PhD degrees who have heard many people, especially your supervisor, about putting the results of your research in Arxiv, before submitting to a Journal. As you know, Arxiv is a free archive for posting articles. Although it's very appealing and seductive to put the file on the Arxiv website and publish it on the Internet, it can have risky results that will engage your mind for a long time and cause your displeasure. Hence, I'm going to highlight the major disadvantages of Arxiv to tell you about the problems that may arise by posting the file to Arxiv.
The most important reason for using Arxiv is that it is free for use. This means you do’ not have to pay, you only need an academic e-mail. But based on an old proverb, there is nothing free without reason, and probably there is an advantage for Arxiv administrators that they manage the database with great expense (as I saw on one of the websites, uploading about 10,000 articles a month). I do not really get into the point that the philosophy of Arxiv managements is spent on this cost. I only look at the user's vision of the one who wants to use it, and I will continue to mention its positive and negative aspects..
Advantages of Arxiv:
1- Provides a free space to put your results in English.
2- Your submitted article is usually published in addition to the Arxiv, in several websites related to it.
3- Your article will be promptly approved and published without any scientific judgment and only by reviewing the general structure by Arxiv.
4- If your results are impressive in your research, since you put it in Arxiv, your result is known by your name.
5- Putting a file in Arxiv allows you to get feedback from others and correct the mistakes of the article because they are seen by other people.
6- It is possible to refer to your article by others.
Disadvantages of Arxiv:
Along with the benefits mentioned above, Arxiv has major disadvantages as well:
1- Your article will be published promptly by Arxiv without any reviewing in terms of writing or scientific. Therefore, it can be expected that most of the texts in the Arxiv have both scientific and literary mistakes.
2- Right at the same time as publishing your article in Arxiv, all the authors of the articles that you refer to them will be notified of the publication of your results by email, which if they are found to be inaccurate or incorrect.
3- One of the problems with posting content in Arxiv is that some journals do not have an interest in publishing an article you have previously posted on the Arxiv. Of course, the number of these types of journals is very low, and they are usually mentioned in the section on submit the articles that they do not accept the article published in Arxiv.
4- Since the articles are likely to have errors, so you need to correct them, in which case your main problem will start with Arxiv. In the simplest case, suppose there are a few simple writings or conceptual mistakes in your article, in which case Arxiv will allow you to correct them, but all previous incorrect versions of your article will still remain available to readers with errors and mistakes.
5- Worse of all, suppose that you realize that your results are incorrect overall, then you would prefer to withdraw your article from the Arxiv website. In this case, Arxiv again allows you to withdraw your article by placing a comment on the page of your article and mentioning the reasons for its withdrawing. But surprisingly, all previous versions of the article that you have admitted to false are still open to readers. In fact, even though you have acknowledged the mistakes of your results and explicitly stated this, others have access to the same wrong results on the web.
6- People working with you in the same area may get better results and publish them by seeing and improving your results. So, if they can publish their own results sooner than you, you will no longer be able to publish your results, and you found results that no journal eager to publish, due to better results.
7- Putting an article in the Arxiv may seem inappropriately available, but because no judgment has been made in your article, this article is scientifically and academically worthless, and an article presented at a conference is more credible and worthwhile, and has more value than an article published in the Arxiv.
8- In general, the main issue of Arxiv is that by placing an article on it, you are no longer the owner of that article, and practically there is no way to delete the previous versions of the error or to delete the article altogether if you make a fundamental mistake. This is where you have to say nothing is free without reason!A few suggestions:
1- By considering the pages of many of the world's leading academics and expertises in your area, you'll probably find that most of them did not even have one file in the Arxiv. They are more interested in publishing their results in valid conferences and strong journals, so if Arxiv had a serious advantage, they also chose it. Instead, usually novice students and professors are putting files in the Arxiv. So, putting the file in the Arxiv is not a worthwhile topic.
2- Postpone putting your manuscript to the Arxiv until you have been completely sure of the accuracy of your results.
3- If your university is accepting conference articles, submit your results to valid conferences that do principled review. Because writing a paper at a conference is much more credible than sending it to Arxiv.
4- You should avoid putting your results at Arxiv, because the results that a student earns in a short period is not so dramatic as he fears them that he will engage himself with the Arxiv system. Also, someone, maybe will see your incomplete results and complete an publish it before you. At the same time, putting your article in Arxiv is always an advantage to others, the advantage is that by placing your unpublished article in Arxiv, the number of references to articles from people you've used from their article in your manuscript is increased.
5- Avoid referring to Arxiv's articles. Because the reference to an article that has not been officially reviewed and is still unclear that is true or false, it's not logical.
Conclusion:
Arxiv may be somewhat good in some aspects, but it has long time until it reaches a desirable structure, it requires some modifications in its rules and how to use it, some of which I will mention later.
1- It is better to place different options for users on how to distribute them when placing files, for example, whether the user wants to share the file on other sites or just Arxiv.
2- It should allow users to decide whether to modify the file and provide a new file if the user wishes to be left behind.
3- If the user decides to withdraw the article, allow the file to be completely deleted from the Arxiv site and its related sites. Since it is not reasonable to remain a mistake file that is made by the author himself to be incorrect, stay in the web and cause people to be confused.
4- By allowing users to remove previous versions of the error and removing the withdrawal articles, less space will be lost to the Arxiv environment for these invalid data.